Her Game Her Voice™
Her Game Her Voice™ is the podcast where women’s basketball meets bold conversations about gender parity, the unique challenges female athletes face, and the moments—both on and off the court—that shape the game.
From buzzer-beating triumphs to air balls that leave us shaking our heads (like Pitbull at the WNBA All-Star halftime show—really?!), Kaari breaks it all down with insight, humor, and a passion for the game.
She’ll share what she’s learned from Basketball Hall of Fame Coach Tara VanDerveer, cover stories from the Golden State Valkyries, Stanford Women’s Basketball, and the WNBA, and bring in special guests—players, coaches, and insiders—to give their perspectives.
Whether you’re a diehard fan, a casual observer, or someone who just discovered the WNBA through Taylor Swift’s friendship with Caitlin Clark, Her Game Her Voice has something for you.
Join the conversation and find Her Game Her Voice wherever you get your podcasts.
Her Game Her Voice™
WNBA at 30 Part 4, Technicals Explained, and Gen Z Is All In
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
The WNBA needed a superstar. And when the league tipped off in 1997, that superstar wasn’t the obvious choice.
In Part 4 of WNBA at 30: How Did We Get Here?, we meet Cynthia Cooper, the WNBA’s first true superstar—and the player who helped turn a brand-new league into must-see basketball.
Then, in this week’s Listener Question, we’re talking technical fouls. What’s the difference between a technical and a regular personal foul? What makes a foul flagrant? And how do officials decide between a Flagrant 1 and a Flagrant 2? We’ll also look at the recent DiJonai Carrington/Sophie Cunningham incident and the gray area between what’s written in the rulebook and how officials apply it on the court.
And there's also the Awards:
🏀 Buzzer Beater Award: The next generation of women’s basketball fans is sending a pretty clear message about where the sport is headed.
🏀 Airball Award: When your own social media post appears to contradict one of your league’s most important rules… that’s probably not a slam dunk.
🏀 Flagrant Foul Award: A heated confrontation in the stands raises an important question about leadership—and the responsibility that comes with representing a WNBA franchise.
“Big stories, little episodes—amplifying the voices shaping the game on and off the court." - Her Game Her Voice Podcast by Kaari Peterson
Howdy hoop heads, and welcome to another episode of Her Game Her Voice, the podcast with big stories about women's basketball in 15 minutes or less. I'm your host, Kaari Peterson.
KaariToday on the pod, part four of "WNBA at 30 How Did We Get Here", I'll answer a listener question about technical fouls, and I'll wrap it up with the awards.
KaariNow let's tip it off.
WNBA at 30: How Did We Get Here - The League's First Superstar
KaariAnd now part four of our series WNBA at 30 How Did We Get Here? This one's called The League's First Superstar.
KaariOver the last three episodes, we've been answering one big question. How did the WNBA get here? First, we explored why the league was created. Then we looked at why it survived the battle with the ABL. And last time we met the people who kept the dream alive during some very uncertain years.
KaariBut surviving isn't enough.
KaariEvery great sports league eventually becomes known for someone. Someone fans rearrange their schedules to watch. Someone who makes you think, I can't miss this game.
KaariThe WNBA needed that player. Someone who could prove this brand new league belonged. But here's the twist. The player who became that superstar wasn't the obvious choice.
KaariSo, who was the WNBA's first true superstar?
KaariIf you said Caitlin Clark, that's understandable.
KaariAja Wilson? Great guess.
KaariWhat about Diana Taurasi? Makes sense.
KaariLisa Leslie? You're getting warmer.
KaariThe WNBA's first superstar was Cynthia Cooper.
KaariWait, what?
KaariAnd honestly, at first glance, she didn't seem like a player you'd build a brand new league around. She was already 34 years old, an age when many basketball players are beginning to think about retirement.
KaariMost American sports fans barely knew who she was because she'd spent more than a decade playing professionally in Italy and Spain. Back then, if you were one of the best women's basketball players in the world, you usually had to leave the U.S. to make a living playing the game.
KaariCynthia wasn't a flashy rookie with years of WNBA stardom ahead of her. But sometimes greatness doesn't arrive the way we expect.
KaariHere's something I find fascinating. The WNBA didn't discover its first superstar. It finally gave one of the world's best basketball players a stage big enough for America to see her.
KaariThe moment the WNBA tipped off in 1997, Cynthia Cooper didn't just become the league's best player. She became its first must-watch player.
KaariShe won the league's very first most valuable player award. And then she won it again the next year. She led the Houston Comets to four consecutive WNBA championships.
KaariAnd here's a record that still stands nearly 30 years later. Each time the Comets won a WNBA championship, Cynthia Cooper was named Finals MVP.
KaariNo player in WNBA history has ever matched that accomplishment. Think about that. During the league's first four seasons, if there was a championship celebration, Cynthia Cooper was standing right in the middle of it.
KaariHer scoring, leadership, competitiveness, confidence. She gave the young WNBA something every new sports league desperately needs a reason to tune in, a reason to buy a ticket, and a reason to believe.
KaariCynthia Cooper was a player people wanted to watch. And that's what true superstars do. They don't just win games, they create fans.
KaariToday, Caitlin Clark fills arenas. Aja Wilson dominates highlight reels. Breanna Stewart, Napheesa Collier, Sabrina Ionescu, and others continue pushing the game to new heights.
KaariBut before any of them, there was Cynthia Cooper.
KaariShe showed America just how spectacular women's professional basketball could be. And in doing so, she helped convince fans that this new league wasn't just going to survive. It was going to thrive. And it was worth believing in.
Listener Question
KaariAnd now it's time for our listener question.
KaariThis week's question is from Jordan in Nashville, Tennessee, who asked, How does the WMBA technical foul system work? And how is it different from a regular foul?
KaariThanks for the question, Jordan.
KaariWhile I couldn't verify that the league is calling more technical fouls than ever before, they've definitely been more visible this year because of several high-profile incidents. And because some players have gotten pretty close to the league's suspension threshold for technical fouls, (which is eight.)
KaariI'm talking about you, Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.
KaariSo what's the difference between the types of fouls?
KaariWell, a regular personal foul is illegal physical contact during play.
KaariA technical foul, on the other hand, is usually about behavior or breaking one of the league's administrative rules.
KaariThe most common technicals are for, quote, unsportsmanlike conduct, things like disrespectfully addressing an official, excessive arguing, profanity, taunting, or showing resentment toward a call.
KaariCaitlin and Angel have been awarded many technical files for their various interactions with officials.
KaariThere are also technicals that have nothing to do with conduct. These are the administrative technicals, and therefore things like delay of game, defensive three seconds, having too many players on the court, or deliberately hanging on the basket.
KaariNow here's where things can get a little — assuming you're not already confused.
KaariA flagrant foul is not a technical foul. A flagrant is a type of personal foul, but one involving contact that's more serious than a normal personal foul. The WNBA has two levels of flagrants. Flagrant one is contact that's considered unnecessary.
KaariA flagrant two is contact that is considered unnecessary and excessive. And a flagrant two gets a player automatically ejected from the game.
KaariSo how does an official decide between a technical and a flagrant?
KaariWell, think of it this way: a technical foul is generally about conduct, something a player does that is considered unsportsmanlike or detrimental to the game.
KaariA flagrant foul is about physical contact. And the key word with a flagrant to is excessive. The contact doesn't necessarily have to be intentional, it just has to be excessive.
KaariAnd officials are usually evaluating the nature and severity of that contact itself. So the next time you hear a ref blow the whistle and signal a technical, you'll know it's not really about physical contact. It might be about conduct, it might be an administrative violation.
KaariIf there's a lot of physical contact involved, it's not a technical foul or a simple personal foul. It's probably a flagrant one or two foul. And here's a recent example of a flagrant two call that puts all of this into context.
KaariEarlier this week, Chicago Sky Guard DiJonai Carrington was chasing Indiana Fever Guard Sophie Cunningham, who had the ball and was heading in for a layup. Carrington threw her arm up and made contact with Cunningham across the face and neck.
KaariCunningham went down hard, then popped back up and got in Carrington's face. She pushed Carrington and the two players had to be separated by their teammates.
KaariThe officials reviewed the play and assessed Carrington a flagrant two.
KaariAnd if you've been paying attention, you know what that means. She was immediately ejected from the game.
KaariNow, there's been a lot of discussion about whether Carrington intentionally hit Cunningham in the face. But remember what we just talked about. Intent isn't a deciding factor.
KaariFor a flagrant two foul, the contact has to be deemed unnecessary and excessive. And that's what the officials determined in this case.
KaariNow, my dear listeners, you are an educated bunch of basketball fans at this point. So knowing what you know now about technical fouls, what do you think?
KaariWouldn't you expect Sophie Cunningham's reaction, getting in Carrington's face and pushing her, to be worthy of a technical?
KaariWell, she didn't get one.
KaariThe explanation from the officials was that Cunningham's reaction was considered acceptable given the severity of the initial contact.
KaariAnd this is where things get a little squishy.
KaariBecause I went back to the WNBA rulebook, and there isn't a specific provision that says essentially "a player gets a pass for unsportsmanlike conduct if it's a natural reaction to something that just happened to them."
KaariIn fact, the rule book's language on fighting specifically says that being provoked by another player is not an acceptable excuse for retaliating.
KaariSo I think this is a really interesting example of the difference between what the rulebook says and how officials apply their judgment on the court.
KaariCarrington's flagrant 2 was a pretty clear application of the r ules.
KaariCunningham's reaction?
KaariThat's where we definitely get into a gray area.
KaariThanks for the question, Jordan.
KaariDo you have one for me?
KaariSend it to Host at HerGameHervoice.com.
KaariAnd now it's time for the awards.
Buzzer Beater Award
KaariFirst, the Buzzer Beater Award.
KaariThis week's Buzzer Beater Award goes to Generation Z women's basketball fans.
KaariIf you've been wondering whether the next generation is buying into women's basketball, here's your answer. According to Ticketmaster's new State of Play Sports Report, 71% of Gen Z female sports fans say women's basketball is their favorite sport.
KaariSo why does this matter?
KaariWell, every new fan creates new opportunities. More fans lead to bigger TV audiences, more sponsorships, better facilities, stronger media coverage, and ultimately more opportunities for WNBA players.
KaariWe don't know exactly how Gen Z will shape the future of the game, but if this trend continues, the future of women's basketball looks incredibly bright.
KaariAnd that's why this week's Buzzer Beater Award goes to Gen Z women's basketball fans.
Airball Award
KaariAnd now the Airball Award.
KaariThis week's Airball Award goes to the WNBA social media team. During All-Star Weekend, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers were caught on video joking about a $400 wager on the upcoming Dream Wings game.
KaariThe league's official social media account thought it would be fun content and posted it.
KaariThe problem?
KaariThe WNBA's collective bargaining agreement is crystal clear.
KaariPlayers are prohibited from wagering on WNBA games.
KaariIt looked like two friends trash talking and making a friendly bet.
KaariBut when your league has a strict no-betting policy and spends every season reminding players about it, you probably don't want to be the one promoting a video that appears to show the exact thing your rules prohibit.
KaariFans noticed almost immediately.
KaariThe post disappeared, and the WNBA later admitted it, quote, "missed the mark."
KaariThe league also said it would use the incident to remind players that even joking about wagering on WNBA games can create the wrong impression.
KaariSo this week's Airball Award goes to the WNBA social media team.
KaariBecause when your own rule book says don't do this, maybe you shouldn't post about it.
Flagrant Foul Award
KaariAnd finally, the Flagrant Foul Award.
KaariThis week's Flagrant Foul Award goes to minority co-owner of the Seattle Storm, Celeste Keaton.
KaariLast week during the Fever Storm game in Seattle, Keaton confronted two teenage Indiana Fever fans in the stands over shirts they were wearing related to the ongoing debate surrounding transgender athletes in women's sports.
KaariThe interaction reportedly became heated and, according to multiple reports, included profanity directed at the teens.
KaariThe WNBA later suspended Keaton for five home games, find the storm organization, and the team issued a public apology.
KaariNow, the issue of transgender participation in sports is one that reasonable people disagree on. It's a complicated conversation, and there are passionate opinions on all sides.
KaariBut that's not what this award is about. This is about leadership.
KaariWhen you're part of a team's ownership group, you're held to a higher standard. Fans, especially young fans, shouldn't find themselves in a personal confrontation with someone representing the franchise.
KaariIf there are concerns about fan behavior, there are established arena policies and security personnel to handle those situations.
KaariSports should be a place where people can cheer for their team, support their players, and yes, even express viewpoints that others may disagree with, as long as they remain within arena rules.
KaariLeadership isn't tested when everyone agrees with you, it's tested when they don't.
KaariCongratulations on your flagrant foul awards, Celeste.
Sign-Off
KaariI'm Kaari Peterson, and you've been listening to Her Game Her Voice.
KaariWant more? Hit follow or subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
KaariThanks for listening and happy hoopin'!